We took a quick look today at the Nat-Nat problems, and in particular around the distinction between + and plus. But the main conversation was over what to do next quarter. The current plan is some combination of learning linear logic (anyone know of great references?!) and blodwen, as the later makes (or at least, is demonstrated to make, which isn't quite the same thing) effective use of linearity constraints in its types.
A weekly discussion on logics, type-theories, and their applications to computing.
We meet Tuesdays 3:00-4:20 in JCL 298.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
12/4/18: The Path Forward
We took a quick look today at the Nat-Nat problems , and in particular around the distinction between + and plus . But the main conversatio...
-
We took a quick look today at the Nat-Nat problems , and in particular around the distinction between + and plus . But the main conversatio...
-
At our first meeting, we agreed to read “The Little Typer” through Chapter 4 (but read below), and seriously outgrew our space, with twe...
-
Our first public meeting will be on Tuesday, October 2nd. I'd like to begin by working through “ The Little Typer ,” by Daniel P. Friedm...
Learning linear logic sounds like a great idea, I will be super interested (makes sense for quantum computing's no-cloning theorem). I attended these lectures by Paul Downen at the last OPLSS, which might serve as a good intro:
ReplyDeleteVideos: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL0DsGHMPLUWWoK7s-j0yGKRThT6bRkxp-
Notes: https://www.cs.uoregon.edu/research/summerschool/summer18/lectures/foundations_notes.pdf (Ch-8, 9)